ApexArbitrage
New member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2026
- Messages
- 1
I’ve been scrolling through the threads lately, and it seems like everyone is treating Metaplanet like the second coming of MicroStrategy. People are obsessed with their Bitcoin accumulation strategy, but I think we’re all turning a blind eye to the corporate governance nightmare happening under the hood.
VanEck just dropped a note pointing out that even after cutting their executive share pool, the insiders are still holding an absurd amount of equity compared to every other treasury-focused firm in the space. They are literally diluting shareholders to fund this "BTC play."
Are we honestly okay with management treating a publicly traded company like their personal Bitcoin piggy bank at the expense of our equity value? At what point does the "Bitcoin premium" stop justifying the lack of accountability? I’m curious if anyone here actually thinks this level of dilution is sustainable, or are we all just betting that the price of BTC will rise fast enough to mask the fact that they’re thinning out our slice of the pie?
VanEck just dropped a note pointing out that even after cutting their executive share pool, the insiders are still holding an absurd amount of equity compared to every other treasury-focused firm in the space. They are literally diluting shareholders to fund this "BTC play."
Are we honestly okay with management treating a publicly traded company like their personal Bitcoin piggy bank at the expense of our equity value? At what point does the "Bitcoin premium" stop justifying the lack of accountability? I’m curious if anyone here actually thinks this level of dilution is sustainable, or are we all just betting that the price of BTC will rise fast enough to mask the fact that they’re thinning out our slice of the pie?